ADVERTISEMENTS

Heidelberg United to pursue appeal after being rejected for AFC Champions League 2

The winner of the Australia Cup typically earns the right to compete in Asia's second-tier Champions League 2 (ACL2) competition on the basis that they also meet the AFC's various licensing requirements which cover everything from finances to governance to home venue standards. 

Heidelberg finished runners-up in the competition after losing the final in extra time 3-1 to Newcastle Jets, who then went on to qualify for the 2026-27 AFC Champions League Elite by way of winning the A-League Premiership (regular season), which saw them cede their ACL2 position to Heidelberg by default.

The NPL Victoria club underwent thorough preparation to get themselves as ready as possible for a potential Asian sojourn, seeking out an alternate home venue to their inadequate Olympic Village and getting the governance side of things up to shape, only to be informed by the AFC on Monday that they could not meet the continent's 'sporting criteria' as a second-tier side. 

Clause 7.4 of competition regulations state that only clubs finishing in the top 50% of a member nation's designated top-flight league can "meet the Sporting Criteria", and whilst there is a strict exemption for "the winner of a domestic cup competition", that exemption would not apply to Heidelberg United as the runners-up of the Australia Cup. 

"It is worth noting that Heidelberg United FC satisfied the mandatory criteria set out in the Football Australia’s National Club Licensing Regulations for AFC Club Licensing purposes," Football Australia said in a media statement on Tuesday.

“We understand this will be a disappointing outcome for everyone connected to Heidelberg United FC. The club earned enormous respect through its performances this season and should be proud of what it achieved both on and off the pitch.

Football Australia advocated that the ACL Two slot be awarded to the runner-up of the Australia Cup, in the rare occasion that the winner of the A-League season is the same as the winner of the Australia Cup.  We respect and accept the outcome of AFC’s review and congratulate all the teams representing Australia in the AFC Champions League next season.

Heidelberg United indicated on Tuesday evening that they would be seeking Football Australia's assistance and counsel for a potential appeal.

"We firmly believe that pursuing opportunities at the highest levels of competition is important not only for Heidelberg United FC, but for the broader grassroots football community,” the club said in a statement.

“We also believe this matter carries significant implications for clubs outside of the A-League system and the pathway available to them.

Furthermore there appears to be some ambiguity relating to Article 7.4 of the AFC Club Competitions Entry Regulations.

“It does not suggest that in the event that the winner of the ‘Cup competition’ is unable to fulfil its position because it has qualified by winning the league that that position will be filled by a team from the domestic league and not by the team that earnt the right to be in the final.

Accordingly, the club reserves its right to appeal the decision and has written to Football Australia requesting them to outline the Appeals Process. We will be appealing and evaluating all our options.”

It is understood that Heidelberg would have been approved for the ACL2 had they won the Australia Cup outright.

The silver lining for the future of semi-professional football in Australia is that Heidelberg's success in meeting all other licensing requirements has opened the door for an NPL club to qualify for Asia via the Australia Cup title, should they also meet mandatory off-field criteria.

Outras notícias